Porcelain Publishing / CT / Volume 8 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.47297/wspctWSP2515-470212.20240802
ARTICLE

Signifier Fetishism and Biopolitics: Production of Subjectivity in Reading Activity

Penghan Zhang1
Show Less
1 Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Published: 25 December 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Abstract

In Truth and Method, Gadamer attempts to articulate the process of understanding as a less subjective event, but presupposes a certain subjectivity with his construction of a textual ethics. Such program of de-subjectivation in the notion of reading also has its malaise in its (post-)structuralist variants, especially the idea of self-deriving texts, which I will term as signifier fetishism and describe in its three modalities. Baudrillard's critique of notions of use value and need exemplifies that signifier fetishism ignores the productivity in the realization of use value. By adapting Paolo Virno's arguments on immaterial labor, reading activity can be considered as consumption with its productivity mostly beyond dominant capitalist productive relations. Referring to the notion of biopolitical production from Hardt and Negri, a tentative characterization of reading as production will convert the issue of hermeneutic subject into the one of becoming-subjectivity.

Keywords
Reading; Signifier fetishism; Use value; Immaterial labor
Biopolitical production
References

[1]Althusser, Louis, and Étienne Balibar (1970).Reading Capital. Translated by B. Brewster. London: NLB.

[2]Baudrillard, Jean (1981).For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Translated by C. Levin. St. Louis: Telos Press,1981.

[3]Beetz, Johannes (2016).Materiality and Subject in Marxism,(Post-)structuralism, and Material Semiotics. London:Palgrave Macmillan.

[4]Derrida, Jacques (1988). "Signature Event Context." Translated by S. Weber and J. Mehlman.Limited Inc. Evanston:Northwestern University Press.

[5]Derrida, Jacques (1979). "Living on." Translated by J. Hulbert, in Harold Bloom et al.,Deconstruction and Criticism.New York: Seabury Press.

[6]Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2004).Truth and Method. Translated by J. Weinsheimer, and D. G. Marshall, London:Continuum.

[7]Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri (2005).Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Book.

[8]Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri (2009).Commonwealth. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

[9]Poulantzas, Nicos (1978).Political Power and Social Classe. Translated by T. O'Hagan. London: Verso.

[10]Puar, Jasbir K (2012). "'I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess': Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory."philoSOPHIA,2.1:49-66.

[11]Virno, Paolo (1996). 'Immaterial Labor.' in Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Edited by P. Virno and M. Hardt.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[12]Vološinov, V N (1986).Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

Share
Back to top
Critical Theory, Electronic ISSN: 2753-5193 Print ISSN: 2515-4702, Published by Porcelain Publishing