From Passive Erosion of Synergy to Strategic Disengagement: Knowledge Exchange in Hong Kong’s Higher Education under the Broader Context of Securitization

This paper examines the changing conditions of academic exchange in Hong Kong’s higher education amid the intensification of national security discourse following the 2019 protests and the implementation of the National Security Law. Drawing on securitization theory and the psychological concept of fluid compensation, it argues that the narrowing space for critical inquiry is not just the result of direct repression but reflects a deeper pattern of adaptive behavior. Scholars who find themselves facing constraints on academic freedom often respond not through overt opposition or alignment, but by redirecting their work toward less politically sensitive domains—a compensatory strategy that preserves meaning, stability, and professional identity. The study also highlights the intersubjective nature of securitization, which is shaped through the interaction between courts, government, media, academia, and the masses. In this context, academic silence and disengagement should be seen not as surrender, but as a form of negotiated adjustment to structural uncertainty and the shifting boundaries of permissible knowledge.
Baehr, P. (2022). Hong Kong Universities in the Shadow of the National Security Law. Society, 59 (3), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00709-9.
Ballis, A. (2025). “Geopolitical Tensions and Financial Networks: Strategic Shifts Toward Alternatives.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21480. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21480.
BBC News. (2023). Hong Kong Academic Freedom: How Universities wither under Beijing’s control. BBC News 中文. https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chinese-news-67678590
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Chan, C. (2024). Scholarship in Times of Constitutional Transformation: A View from Hong Kong. Human Rights Law Review, 24 (1), ngad037. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad037.
Chen, A. H. Y. (2022). The National Security Law of the HKSAR: A Contextual and Legal Study. In Hong Kong’s National Security Law: Restoration and Transformation, edited by Hualing Fu and Michael Hor. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
CNN. (2021). Hong Kong University Faces Pressure under National Security Law. CNN, September 18, 2021. https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/18/asia/hong-kong-university-nsl-china-intl-hnk-dst/index.html.
Cook, S. (2020). Hong Kong’s Academic Freedom Withers under National Security Law: The law, imposed by Beijing, has exerted a creeping influence over the territory’s vaunted education sector. Freedom House, November 23, 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/article/hong-kongs-academic-freedom-withers-under-national-security-law.
De Graaf, B. (2011). Evaluating Counterterrorism Performance: A Comparative Study. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Ding, D. (2025). Theoretical Interpretation of and Practical Response to the Securitization of China-US Relations. Teaching and Research, 59 (5): 127.
Emergency Regulations Ordinance (Cap. 241, ERO). Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Enacted 28 February 1922; in force. https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap241!en?INDEX_CS=N.
Eroukhmanoff, C. (2015). The Remote Securitisation of Islam in the US Post-9/11: Euphemisation, Metaphors and the ‘Logic of Expected Consequences’ in Counter-Radicalisation Discourse. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8 (2), 246-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2015.1053747.
Executive Office of the President. (2025). Ensuring National Security and Economic Resilience Through Section 232 Actions on Processed Critical Minerals and Derivative Products. April 18, 2025.
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2025-06836.
Fawzi, S. (2022). The Impact of Ethnic Groups on National Security. Future Journal of Social Science 1 (2): 1-17.
Filimon, L. M. (2016). An Overview of the Copenhagen School’s Approach to Security Studies: Constructing (In)security through Performative Power. Revista Română de Studii Baltice şi Nordice 8 (2): 47-72. https://doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v8i2_4
Fraenkel, E., & Meierhenrich J. (Eds.). (2017). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Translated from the German by E. A. Shils, Edith Lowenstein, and Klaus Knorr; with an introduction by Jens Meierhenrich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fu, H. (2025). Managed Freedom in Precarious Times: Maintaining Academic Freedom in Transitional Hong Kong. Global Constitutionalism. 14 (1), 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381724000157.
Fu, H., & Hor M. (Eds.). (2022). The National Security Law of Hong Kong: Restoration and Transformation. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Fu, H., & Zhai X. (2020). Two Paradigms of Emergency Power: Hong Kong’s Liberal Order Meeting the Authoritarian State. Hong Kong Law Journal, 50. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3729384
Global Times. (2021). Editorial: Hong Kong’s Journey from Chaos to Order Has Become a Broad Expectation at Home and Abroad [社评:香港由乱到治已成内外广泛预期]. Global Times, March 30, 2021. https://opinion.huanqiu.com/article/42WALX2Ob7N.
Guan, R. (2024). A Study on the “Securitization Dilemma” of the Darwin Port Lease under the Securitization Theory of the Copenhagen School [哥本哈根学派“安全化”理论视域下达尔文港租约“安全化”困境研究]. PhD diss., Beijing Foreign Studies University. https://doi.org/10.26962/d.cnki.gbjwu.2024.000267.
Hansen, A. (2024). A Public Unconvinced: Exploring the Effects of the Hong Kong Government’s Attempt to Securitize the 2019–2020 Protests. Unpublished manuscript, Lund University Libraries. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9153990&fileOId=9153996
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (2), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1.
Hirschauer, S. (2019). For Real People in Real Places: The Copenhagen School and the Other ‘Little Security Nothings’. European Security, 28 (4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1649654.
HK Gov, Hong Kong Government. (2022). The Chief Executive’s Policy Address 2022. Hong Kong SAR Government. https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2022/en/p7.html.
Ho, M. (2020). How Protests Evolve: Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Movement and Lessons Learned from the Umbrella Movement. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25 (SI), 711-728.
Howell, J. (2014). The Securitisation of NGOs Post-9/11. Conflict, Security and Development, 14 (2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.903692.
Huang, J., & Tsai, K. S. (2021). Upgrading Big Brother: Local Strategic Adaptation in China’s Security Industry. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56 (4), 560-587.
Huang, J., & Tsai, K. S. (2022). Securing Authoritarian Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Political Economy of Surveillance in China. The China Journal, 88 (1), 2-28.
Human Rights Watch. (2024). Hong Kong: Academic Freedom Declines Under Security Law: Students, Academics Face Censorship, Harassment, Growing Restrictions on Rights. Human Rights Watch, September 24, 2024. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/24/hong-kong-academic-freedom-declines-under-security-law.
Hung, H. (2022). 邊際危城: 資本, 帝國與抵抗視野下的香港 [Marginal City in Crisis: Capital, Empire, and Resistance Perspectives on Hong Kong]. Taipei: 讀書共和國/左岸文化
Ip, E. C. (2020). The Logical Foundations of Judicial Review of Legislation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Hong Kong Law Journal, 50(1), 19-34
Jackson, L. (2022). Academic Freedom as Experience, Relation and Capability: A View from Hong Kong. In Handbook on Academic Freedom, 226-242. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kim, M. S. (2025). CHIP Security: Reconciling Industrial Subsidies with WTO Rules and National Security Exception. Harvard National Security Journal, 16 (1).
Levy, C. (2010). Refugees, Europe, Camps/State of Exception: “Into the Zone”, the European Union and Extraterritorial Processing of Migrants, Refugees, and Asylum-seekers (Theories and Practice). Refugee Survey Quarterly. 29 (1), 92-119.
Lin, G. & Prazeres, T. L. (2021). Abusive Adoption of National Security Argument to Trade Policy and Direction of Reforms [国家安全问题对国际贸易政策的影响及改革方向]. Journal of International Trade (国际贸易问), (1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2021.01.001.
Liu, J. (2025). Big Pharma and Monopoly Capital: Four Dynamics in the Decline of Innovation. Monthly Review: An Independent Socialist Magazine, 77 (2), 48-61.
Liu, X., Zhang, X., & Starkey, H. (2023). Ideological and Political Education in Chinese Universities: Structures and Practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43 (2), 586–598.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2024). Towards Governmentality with Chinese Characteristics: Higher Education Policy Discourses in Post-Colonial Hong Kong and Macao. Comparative Education, 60 (4), 626–646.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2023). Departing from Hybridity: Higher Education Development and University Governance in Postcolonial Hong Kong. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44 (3), 407–424.
Lo, W. Y. W., & Wan, C. D. (2021). Revisiting the Asian regulatory regimes in transnational education: How local politics (re) oriented higher education policy in Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(2), 113-130.
Loper, K. A., & Petersen, C. J. (2022). Academic Freedom in the Shadow of Hong Kong’s National Security Law. In The National Security Law of Hong Kong: Restoration and Transformation, edited by Hualing Fu and Michael Hor, chap. 12, 255-278. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789888754472-012.
Mann, M. (1984). The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 25 (2), 185-213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600004239.
Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power. Volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (MFA). 2021. 国务委员兼外交部长王毅就中国外交政策和对外关系回答中外记者提问 [State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi Responds to Domestic and Foreign Journalists’ Questions on China’s Foreign Policy and External Relations]. March 7, 2021. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/wjbz_673089/zyjh_673099/202103/t20210307_9889223.shtml.
Mitchell, R. (2020). A “Guardian” Controversy over Hong Kong’s Basic Law? Hong Kong Law Journal 50, 463.
Mutimer, D. (2016). Critical Security Studies: A Schismatic History. In Contemporary Security Studies, 4th ed., edited by Alan Collins, 87-107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First published 2007.
Ng, H. K. M., & Wong, J. D. O. (Eds.) (2020)(1). Civil Unrest in Hong Kong: Law and Order from Historical and Cultural Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ng, M., Zhang, S., & Wong, M. (2020)(2). Who but the Governor in Executive Council Is the Judge? Historical Use of the Emergency Regulations Ordinance. Hong Kong Law Journal, 50, 425.
Otukoya, T. A. (2024). Applying Securitization Theory in Armed Conflict. International Journal of Social Research and Analysis. https://ijsra.net/sites/default/files/IJSRA-2024-0226.pdf; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378548356_Applying_securitization_theory_in_armed_conflict.
Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2010). The Frog in Kierkegaard’s Beer: Finding Meaning in the Threat-Compensation Literature. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 889-905.
Randles, D., McGregor, I., Brassard, C. G., Hebb, S. B., & Arpin, M. P. (2015). Is Dissonance Reduction a Special Case of Fluid Compensation? Evidence That Dissonant Cognitions Cause Compensatory Affirmation and Abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108 (5), 697-710.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shum, M. (2021). One Year On, Here’s How China’s National Security Law Has Changed Hong Kong. Washington Post, June 30, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/30/one-year-heres-how-chinas-national-security-law-has-changed-hong-kong/.
Silver, A. (2020). Hong Kong’s Contentious National Security Law Concerns Some Academics: Plans for the New Bill Follow Months of Protests, but Researchers Are Divided about How It Might Affect Them. Nature, June 10, 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01693-y.
Stępka, M. (2022). The Copenhagen School and Beyond: A Closer Look at Securitisation Theory. In Identifying Security Logics in the EU Policy Discourse, 19–38. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93035-6_2.
Stritzel, H. (2007). Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 13 (3), 357-383.
Stritzel, H. (2014). Securitization Theory and the Copenhagen School. In Security in Translation, 15–34. New Security Challenges Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307576_2.
Sweet, A. S. (2020). The Necessity of Balancing: Hong Kong’s Flawed Approach to Proportionality, and Why It Matters. Hong Kong Law Journal, 50, 541-548.
Tang, H. (2023). Redefining Hong Kong’s Role as a Super Connector through Headquarters Economy. HKU Business School. https://www.hkubs.hku.hk/research/thought-leadership/hkej-column/redefining-hong-kongs-role-as-a-super-connector-through-headquarters-economy/.
Tang, Y. (2024). Global Data Security through the Lens of Securitization Theory [安全化理论视角下的全球数据安全]. Cross-strait Legal Science (海峡法学), 26 (4), 17-28.
The Witness. (2023). Consultation Documents Repeatedly Refer to the 2019 Conflict as “Black Violence” and “Color Revolution”, Reflecting National Security Risks but Not Mentioning the Anti-Extradition Bill [諮詢文件屢指2019衝突為「黑暴」、「顏色革命」,反映國安風險,未提反修例]. The Witness, 2023. https://thewitnesshk.com/23%E6%A2%9D-%E8%AB%AE%E8%A9%A2%E6%96%87%E4%BB%B6%E5%B1%A2%E6%8C%872019%E8%A1
%9D%E7%AA%81%E7%82%BA%E9%BB%91%E6%9A%B4%E9%A1%8F%E8%89%B2%E9%9D
Tian, F. (2024). The Overall National Security Concept and the Institutional Legitimacy of Hong Kong’s Article 23 Legislation [总体国家安全观与香港23条立法的制度正当性]. Journal of United Front Studies (统一战线学研究), 8 (3), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.13946/j.cnki.jcqis.2024.03.013.
U.S. Congress. (2024). STRATEGIC MATERIALS Related Term(s) National Security. Congressional Record, 118th Congress, 2nd Session. https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/congressional-record-index/118th-congress/2nd-session/strategic-materials-related-term-s-national-security/1906422?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
U.S. Department of State (DOS). (2021). Read a Section: Hong Kong. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/china/hong-kong/.
van Munster, R. (2005). Logics of Security: The Copenhagen School, Risk Management. Political Science Publications, Vol. 10. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southern Denmark.
Wæver, O. (1993). Securitization and Desecuritization (Vol. 5). Copenhagen: Centre for Peace and Conflict Research. https://www.libraryofsocialscience.com/assets/pdf/Waever-Securitization.pdf.
Wong, L., & Kellogg, T. E. (2021). Hong Kong’s National Security Law: A Human Rights and Rule of Law Analysis. Center for Asian Law, Georgetown Law. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/law-asia/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/02/GT-HK-Report-Accessible.pdf.
Xinhua News Agency. (2019). 修例风波中暴力乱港实录[A Record of Violent Disturbances Disrupting Hong Kong during the Extradition Bill Protests]. August 16, 2019. http://www.locpg.gov.cn/jsdt/2019-08/16/c_1210244413.htm.
Yam, S.-Y. S. (2020). Fear in the Classroom: How Hong Kong’s National Security Law Suppresses Academic and Intellectual Freedom. Made in China Journal. October 21, 2020. https://madeinchinajournal.com/2020/10/21/fear-in-the-classroom-how-hong-kongs-national-security-law-suppresses-academic-and-intellectual-freedom/.
Yang, W. (2024). Academic Freedom Declines under Hong Kong’s National Security Regime, Report Finds. Voice of America, February 27, 2024. https://www.voanews.com/a/academic-freedom-declines-under-hong-kong-s-national-security-regime-report-finds-/7797384.html.
Yeon, T., & Siu, D. (2021). Judicial Control and Interpretation of Emergency Powers: Lessons from Hong Kong. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 21 (2), 291–312.
Zhang, C. (2021). “Illegal Religious Activities” and Counter-Terrorism in China. Politics and Religion, 14(2), 269-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048320000309
Zhang, J. (2024). Heading in the Direction of Bifurcated Networks: Hong Kong’s Evolution amidst the Global Submarine Cable System. Asian Review of Political Economy, 3 (1), 8.
Zhao, K., & Lang K. (2022). On the Supply Chain Security under China–U.S. Competition[中美竞争下的供应链安全研究]. Northeast Asia Forum[东北亚论坛] 31(2), 19-39, 127. https://doi.org/10.13654/j.cnki.naf.2022.02.002.
Zhu, G., & Zhang X. (2020). Deference as Proper Judicial Attitude: With Special Reference to Anti-Mask Law Judgments. Hong Kong Law Journal, 50, 517-540.
Zhu, H. (2023). A Chinese Law Wedge into the Hong Kong Common Law system: Legal Appraisal of the Hong Kong National Security Law. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, 21, 43-108.