Porcelain Publishing / BJBPR / Volume 2 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.47297/ppibjbpr2026020102
ARTICLE

Does Distributed Leadership Contribute to Enhancing the Performance of New Product Development? - Evidence from China

Rui Yi1 Jinzhi Luo1 Kaijun Luo1 Yuxuan Chen1
Show Less
1 School of Business, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411100, China
© Invalid date by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Abstract

In the rapidly changing digital economy era, the transformation of leadership style is an important issue in corporate strategic decision-making and also a key reason for enhancing innovation efficiency.This study investigates the impact of distributed leadership on new product development performance. Drawing on loose coupling theory and dynamic capability theory, we investigate the underlying mechanisms.This study analyzed the survey data of 226 senior executives of Chinese enterprises,The following conclusions are drawn:(1) Distributed leadership positively influences the performance of new product development in enterprises;(2) Distributed leadership contributes to the performance of new product development in enterprises respectively through the mediating effects of operational agility, customer agility and partner agility.(3) In the relationship of the impact of distributed leadership on the performance of new product development in enterprises, the mediating effect of customer agility is positively regulated by structural differentiation.The research not only expands the study of the causes of new product development,it has also deepened the understanding of the operational mechanism of the distributed leadership model within the organization,and provide theoretical guidance and reference for new product development from the perspective of organizational structure.

Keywords
Distributed Leadership
New Product Development Performance
Loose Coupling Theory
Structural Differentiation
References

Açikgöz, A. (2017). The mediating role of team collaboration between procedural justice climate and new product development performance. International Journal of Innovation Management21(04), 1750039. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500396

 

Agarwal, R., & Selen, W. (2009). Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation. Decision sciences, 40(3), 431-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00236.x

 

Alghamdi, O. A., & Agag, G. (2023). Boosting innovation performance through big data analytics powered by artificial intelligence use: an empirical exploration of the role of strategic agility and market turbulence. Sustainability, 15(19), 14296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914296

 

Appelbaum, S. H., Calla, R., Desautels, D., & Hasan, L. (2017). The challenges of organizational agility (part 1). Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(1), 6-14.https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2016-0027

 

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of management review, 28(2), 238-256.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096  

 

Berraies, S., Hamza, K. A., & Chtioui, R. (2021). Distributed leadership and exploratory and exploitative innovations: mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing and organizational trust. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1287-1318.https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0311

 

Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International journal of management reviews, 13(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x

 

Burgers, J. H., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Why new business development projects fail: coping with the differences of technological versus market knowledge. Long range planning, 41(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.10.003

 

Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of business venturing, 24(3), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.006

 

Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information systems research, 24(4), 976-997. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0500

 

Chan, S. L., & Ip, W. H. (2011). A dynamic decision support system to predict the value of customer for new product development. Decision support systems, 52(1), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.07.002

 

Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 44(4), 516-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0433-x

 

Darawong, C. (2017). Conflict management styles and interpersonal conflict between marketing and R&D personnel during the new product development process. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(06), 1750034. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500341

 

Darawong, C. (2021). The influence of leadership styles on new product development performance: the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(5), 1105-1122. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2019-0290

 

Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International journal of management reviews, 4(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00075

 

Eva, N., Sendjaya, S., Prajogo, D., & Madison, K. (2021). Does organizational structure render leadership unnecessary? Configurations of formalization and centralization as a substitute and neutralizer of servant leadership. Journal of Business Research, 129, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.023

 

Forsythe, C. (1997). Human factors in agile manufacturing: a brief overview with emphasis on communications and information infrastructure. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199724)7:1<3::AID-HFM1>3.0.CO;2-7

 

Fu, L., Liu, Z., & Liao, S. (2018). Is distributed leadership a driving factor of innovation ambidexterity? An empirical study with mediating and moderating effects. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 388-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0134

 

Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of management journal, 48(5), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803920

 

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The leadership quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0

 

Hsu, L. C., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: the mediating role of dynamic capability. British journal of management, 23(2), 179-205. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x

 

Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers' organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and teacher education, 26(3), 565-575. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.006

 

Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization science20(4), 797-811. 

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415

 

Laage-Hellman, J., Lind, F., & Perna, A. (2014). Customer involvement in product development: an industrial network perspective. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 21(4), 257-276. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2014.979594

 

Liao, S., Liu, Z., Fu, L., & Ye, P. (2019). Investigate the role of distributed leadership and strategic flexibility in fostering business model innovation. Chinese management studies, 13(1), 93-112.

https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-02-2018-0420

 

Lu, Y., & K.(Ram) Ramamurthy. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS quarterly, 931-954. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967

 

Lyu, L., Zhang, H., & Gao, K. (2022). Why Does Distributed Leadership Foster or Hamper Bootlegging Behavior of Employees: The Role of Exploratory‐Exploitative Learning Tension and Paradox Mindset. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 3093641. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3093641

 

Mao, H., Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2015). How the effects of IT and knowledge capability on organizational agility are contingent on environmental uncertainty and information intensity. Information Development31(4), 358-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666913518059

 

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

 

Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage publications.

 

Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The journal of strategic information systems27(1), 22-42. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.002

 

Robson, M. J., Chuang, F. M., Morgan, R. E., Bıçakcıoğlu‐Peynirci, N., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2023). New product development process execution, integration mechanisms, capabilities and outcomes: evidence from Chinese high‐technology ventures. British journal of management, 34(4), 2036-2056.

 

Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 237-263. 

https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530

 

Son, J., & Rojas, E. M. (2011). Impact of optimism bias regarding organizational dynamics on project planning and control. Journal of construction engineering and management, 137(2), 147-157. 

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000260

 

Spillane, J. P. (2005, June). Distributed leadership. In The educational forum (Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 143-150). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678

 

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

 

Vaszkun, B., & Sziráki, É. (2023). Unlocking the key dimensions of organizational agility: A systematic literature review on leadership, structural and cultural antecedents. Society and Economy, 45(4), 393-410. 

https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2023.00023

 

Vinodh, S., & Aravindraj, S. (2012). Agility evaluation using the IF–THEN approach. International Journal of Production Research, 50(24), 7100-7109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.627390

 

Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic management journal, 31(1), 88-109.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.806

 

Share
Back to top
British Journal of Business and Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2977-8875 Print ISSN: 2978-4581, Published by Porcelain Publishing